Instructions
Review the rubric to make sure you understand the criteria for earning your grade.
Read What is Summary Judgment? and the case summary Marri v. New York City Transit Authority (2013).
Navigate to the threaded discussion, and respond to the following:
In your own words, explain the summary judgment concept.
Summarize the relevant facts of Marri v. New York City Transit Authority (2013).
Explain why you agree or disagree with the legal ruling in Marri v. New York City Transit Authority (2013).
Your initial post is due by the end of the fourth day of the workshop.
Read and respond to at least two of your classmates postings, as well as all follow-up instructor questions directed to you, by the end of the workshop.
Your postings also should:
Be well developed by providing clear answers with evidence of critical thinking.
Add greater depth to the discussion by introducing new ideas.
Provide clarification to classmates questions and insight into the discussion.
Be posted on three different days during the workshop.
Category: Undergraduate
2.2 Discussion: Summary Judgment
finance
write two different essays on the same word sheet. both essays will be approximately 700 words. The first topic is merger and acquisition in the hospitality industry and the second topic is the asset-light strategy in the hospitality industry. I will provide you for each topic 4 academic references. You can only use them nothing else.
Written Activity #2
Written Activity #2 : When Anthropologists Go “Public
This assignment is next in a series of activities called “Public Anthropology” that we will do this semester. It is inspired by Margaret Mead’s engagement with wider publics – not just other anthropologists. The world, it seems, could benefit from a more anthropological perspective. What is anthropology, what kinds of questions or issues does it raise for you, and how are the skills applicable? What is the “Big Question” that interests you? This is what we are ultimately getting to.
Objective: To think about and synthesize your anthropological learning these past years, and to articulate to nonspecialist audiences the complexities of bringing an anthropological approach to a human problem.
Outcome: Analze the ethics, benefits, and pitfalls of bringing anthropological approaches to wider publics.
First, read the following articles. As usual, some of these are quite short. Your basis for understanding the readings should be the works and discussion from Week 1.
1. Liebow (2018) Actions No More Passive Bystanders, Please
2. Dresser (2020) (Links to an external site.)The Meaning of Margaret Mead (external link); https://aeon.co/essays/how-margaret-mead-became-a-hate-figure-for-conservatives
3. Scheper-Hughes (2009) Actions Making Anthropology Public;
4. Starn, Orin (1986) Actions Engineering Internment
5. Price (2000) Actions Anthropologists as Spies
In one post of appx. 750 words (yes, you may have more), answer the following questions:
1, What are the ethical concerns of bringing anthropology to the wider public? Briefly discuss three points.
2. What are the ethical concerns of NOT bringing anthropology to the wider public?
3. What are the benefits of bringing anthropological perspectives and methods outside of the academy? Discuss three specific points.
4. What are the dangers of bringing anthropological perspectives and methods outside the academy?
The standard Activities Rubric will be used to grade this exercise.
1. Anthropological Perspectives (4) Exhibits awareness and understanding of ethnocentrism, cultural relativity, contexts, and power in all activities;
2. Course Concepts (4) Directly and appropriately utilizes course terminology in all writing and activities;
3. Examples (4) Describes and utilizes appropriate examples from course materials (readings, films, individual fieldwork, media sources);
4. Follows Instructions (4) Is this a compare/contrast discussion? Did you find outside sources if required? Were you supposed to upload an image? Follow the directions!! And put in some effort;
5. Writing, Style, Organization (4) Writing is always important. The writing can be indicative of your effort (see #4 above).
finance
write two essays, each one must be 800 words. The first one will be on merger and acquisition in the hospitality industry, the other one on asset-light strategy in the hospitality industry. Both subjects will have 4 academic references that I will provide you and you can only use them.
America Now: A need for Safe Spaces and A Civil Duty to annoy
1.) discuss each author’s thesis claim and the examples used to support the claim.
2.) if there is more than one reading, compare and contrast both views and evidence presented by the authors by addressing specific points in each essay/article.
3.) explain from a “personal perspective” what you agreed or disagreed with, how your views were challenged or confirmed, etc. There should be a good balance between what was presented in the assigned readings and your own personal opinion (50% summary + 50% reflection).
At the top left hand corner of your RR, please include your name, date, and RR# and a title (title of the readings OR your own title that addresses the theme in the readings).
International Business
3. Conduct an Internet search to find and read at least 3 recent articles that relate to the key term you selected. Articles may be found in the International section of any reputable website that focuses on international business, such as Wall Street Journal, Financial Times, or the Economist. Another good source of information is EBSCOhost, accessible through xxxxx online library. Websites like about.com, britanica.com, Wikipedia etc. do not constitute scholarly academic articles and references.
4. Of the 3 articles youve read, select the article that you wish to discuss, and write a review of it. In addition, you must post all 3 (or more) recent articles to the reference sectioneven though you review only one of them. You may provide additional references, but references do not replace 3 articles that relate to your key term. Actually reference the article you review within the article review. Your review must include the following sections (each section must be structured by a heading for each section):
a. A definition of the key term: this does not count in the 200 word minimum requirement.
b. A summary, in your own words, of the selected article.
c. A discussion, in your own words, of how the article relates to the selected chapter and key term.
d. The complete citation, in APA format, of each of the 3 articles read and any other additional references; these do not count in the 200-word requirement.
e. All references must be annotated.
KEY TERM is IT Network risk
* Previous work you completed attached. Same format.
Political Islamic Concepts
In one or two sentences, provide a definition/description of the following concepts. You can use online resources to complete this assignment.
Hanafi
Maliki
Hanbali
Shafi
al-Ghazali
Kalam
Ibn Arabi
Mecelle
Averroes
Mawdudi
Wahhabi
Naqshbandi
Muhammadiyya (Indonesia)
Maslaha
Fatwa
Afghani
Rashid Rida
Khomeini
Shia theory of Imamate
Twelver Shi’ism
Zaydi
Ibadi
Ahl al Sunna
AKP (turkey)
Ennahda (Tunisia)
Guidance and Discipline
Directions: Be sure to make an electronic copy of your answer before submitting it to Ashworth College for grading. Unless otherwise stated, answer in complete sentences, and be sure to use correct English, spelling and grammar. Sources must be cited in APA format. Your response should be four (4) pages in length; refer to the “Assignment Format” page for specific format requirements.
Lets say you have been reflecting on your first few weeks as a preschool teacher. You often find yourself asking yourself things like, Is this child just grumpy, or is there something more going on? Why arent the children cooperating? How can I manage this negative behavior that is occurring? Is there something more I can do? With that in mind, consider the scenarios in Part A and Part B.
Part A
Three-year-old Tommy is crying and upset because he cant draw a truck like Sams.
For this scenario
Determine the cause of the behavior. Provide one (1) supporting fact to justify your answer, citing your source.
Develop a guidance approach that you might use to address the cause of the behavior. Provide one (1) supporting fact to justify your approach, citing your source.
Part B
The block area is a popular area within the classroom. By the time clean-up arrives, nearly every block is on the floor. As clean-up is announced, children move to other areas, refusing to assist in clean-up of blocks.
For this scenario, describe
two (2) possible causes
two (2) possible guidance strategies. Justify your strategies.
Performance Analysis of Tesla, Inc. Suppliers’ supply chain
Structure:
1. Introduction up to 300 words to present organisation (Tesla Inc.), time period (i.e. last 5 years) and supply chain stage under analysis (Tesla Suppliers’ supply chain)
2. How in the performance of this segment of the organisations supply chain perceived by internal and external stakeholders about 700 words. Draw on secondary and primary evidence from internal and external stakeholders with regards to the performance of the supply chain stage Tesla Suppliers. Reference available measures for a particular time period (up to 5 years back). The measures are quality of supplies, speed of delivery, cost, any other measures welcomed.
3. Performance measures about 400 words. The internal and external performance measures utilised into the analysis, their strengths and weaknesses and the insights they can provide. Sustainability related measures cannot be included in this analysis.
educ
In this brief (3-5 page) paper, you will use both the structural and human resource frames to explain and make sense of an organizational mini-case with which you are familiar (note: this must be an education organization). The mini-case might derive from an organization you now work in or have worked in, or from a published case you are interested in. In writing this piece you are answering the questions: in what ways does the case display the concepts at work? How do the different ways of viewing the case uncover or highlight what is actually happening in the organization?